Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRISX vs FTHFX
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CRISX vs FTHFX
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRISX vs. FTHFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRISX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. CRISX (70.8M). CRISX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: CRISX (0.70) vs FTHFX (0.56). CRISX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CRISX (29 years) vs FTHFX (15 years). CRISX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). CRISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). CRISX (1000000) and FTHFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. CRISX (9.70). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. CRISX (4.67).
| CRISX | FTHFX | CRISX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.64 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.64 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.881 | 14.839 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.8M | 12.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.56 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.70 | 15.30 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.94 | 58.68 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.67 | 60.92 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.77 | 237.29 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers