Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRISX vs FTHFX
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CRISX vs FTHFX
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRISX vs. FTHFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRISX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. CRISX (73.2M). CRISX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: CRISX (0.67) vs FTHFX (0.57). CRISX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CRISX (28 years) vs FTHFX (15 years). CRISX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). CRISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). CRISX (1000000) and FTHFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.56 vs. CRISX (19.77). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. CRISX (4.37).
| CRISX | FTHFX | CRISX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.64 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.64 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.642 | 15.175 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.2M | 12.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.57 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.77 | 25.56 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.17 | 55.30 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.37 | 65.58 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.02 | 231.04 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement