Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRISX vs NAESX
CRISX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CRISX vs NAESX
CRISX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRISX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRISX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. CRISX (73.2M). NAESX pays higher dividends than CRISX: NAESX (1.07) vs CRISX (0.67). CRISX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CRISX (28 years) vs NAESX (66 years). CRISX (1.08) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CRISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRISX: NAESX (0) vs CRISX (1000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.34 vs. CRISX (19.77). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 38.39 vs. CRISX (4.37).
| CRISX | NAESX | CRISX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.17 | 635% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.17 | 635% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.642 | 15.738 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.2M | 189B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.07 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.77 | 23.34 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.17 | 48.12 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.37 | 38.39 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.02 | 157.36 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers