Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRMAX vs FSMDX
CRMAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts CRMAX vs FSMDX
CRMAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRMAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRMAX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. CRMAX (174M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than CRMAX: FSMDX (0.75) vs CRMAX (0.26). CRMAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: CRMAX (22 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). CRMAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). CRMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRMAX: FSMDX (0) vs CRMAX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. CRMAX (11.40). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. CRMAX (-16.01).
| CRMAX | FSMDX | CRMAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.03 | 4,880% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.03 | 4,880% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.564 | 13.837 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 174M | 53.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.75 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.40 | 13.26 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.19 | 56.18 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.01 | 40.31 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.58 | 167.00 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers