Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRMAX vs NAESX
CRMAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CRMAX vs NAESX
CRMAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRMAX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRMAX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. CRMAX (181M). NAESX pays higher dividends than CRMAX: NAESX (1.07) vs CRMAX (0.24). CRMAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CRMAX (22 years) vs NAESX (66 years). CRMAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CRMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRMAX: NAESX (0) vs CRMAX (2500). CRMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.31 vs. NAESX (23.34). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 38.39 vs. CRMAX (-10.05).
| CRMAX | NAESX | CRMAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.17 | 718% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.17 | 718% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.703 | 15.738 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 181M | 189B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 1.07 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.31 | 23.34 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.90 | 48.12 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.05 | 38.39 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.88 | 157.36 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers