Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRQSX vs FWMMX
CRQSX vs FWMMX Comparison
Open Charts CRQSX vs FWMMX
CRQSX vs FWMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CRQSX (4.66B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than CRQSX: FWMMX (1.41) vs CRQSX (0.96). CRQSX was incepted earlier than FWMMX: CRQSX (5 years) vs FWMMX (6 years). FWMMX (0.35) is less costly to investors than CRQSX (0.11). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CRQSX (26.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRQSX: FWMMX (250) vs CRQSX (3000000). CRQSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.73 vs. FWMMX (6.64).
| CRQSX | FWMMX | CRQSX / FWMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.35 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.35 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.467 | 3.946 | 240% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000000 | 250 | 1,200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.66B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.41 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.73 | 6.64 | 252% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.83 | 30.49 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 30.46 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement