Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRQSX vs FWWMX
CRQSX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts CRQSX vs FWWMX
CRQSX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CRQSX (4.68B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than CRQSX: FWWMX (1.40) vs CRQSX (0.92). CRQSX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: CRQSX (5 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). FWWMX (0.31) is less costly to investors than CRQSX (0.11). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CRQSX (26.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRQSX: FWWMX (250) vs CRQSX (3000000). CRQSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.80 vs. FWWMX (6.07).
| CRQSX | FWWMX | CRQSX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.31 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.31 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.477 | 4.494 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000000 | 250 | 1,200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.68B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.40 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.80 | 6.07 | 326% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.01 | 31.23 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 28.46 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |