It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRD’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CRS (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а +4.37% price change this week, while FRD (@Steel) price change was -7.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.02%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.10%.
CRS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
@Steel (+2.43% weekly)The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.
CRS | FRD | CRS / FRD | |
Capitalization | 12.8B | 143M | 8,951% |
EBITDA | 670M | 17.3M | 3,873% |
Gain YTD | 51.462 | 33.740 | 153% |
P/E Ratio | 34.54 | 16.77 | 206% |
Revenue | 2.88B | 465M | 619% |
Total Cash | 316M | 2.1M | 15,055% |
Total Debt | 703M | 35.8M | 1,964% |
CRS | FRD | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRD's Valuation (18) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRS (82). This means that FRD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRS’s over the last 12 months.
CRS's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as FRD (26). This means that CRS’s stock grew similarly to FRD’s over the last 12 months.
CRS's SMR Rating (43) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRD (81). This means that CRS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRD’s over the last 12 months.
FRD's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as CRS (46). This means that FRD’s stock grew similarly to CRS’s over the last 12 months.
FRD's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRS (49). This means that FRD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRS’s over the last 12 months.
CRS | FRD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago75% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 14 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago76% | 1 day ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago67% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MGOV | 20.49 | 0.03 | +0.15% |
First Trust Intermediate Gvt Opps ETF | |||
CLOI | 52.92 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
VanEck CLO ETF | |||
PCCE | 14.36 | -0.04 | -0.26% |
Polen Capital China Growth ETF | |||
HAWX | 38.57 | -0.18 | -0.47% |
iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI ACWI exUS ETF | |||
DEXC | 57.27 | -0.29 | -0.50% |
Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRS has been loosely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRS jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that FRD and IIIN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRD and IIIN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FRD | 100% | -1.36% | ||
IIIN - FRD | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
RYI - FRD | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
ESAB - FRD | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
PRLB - FRD | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.62% | ||
CRS - FRD | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.69% | ||
More |