CRS
Price
$256.27
Change
+$4.26 (+1.69%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
12.78B
15 days until earnings call
FRD
Price
$20.29
Change
-$0.28 (-1.36%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
143.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRS vs FRD

Header iconCRS vs FRD Comparison
Open Charts CRS vs FRDBanner chart's image
Carpenter Technology
Price$256.27
Change+$4.26 (+1.69%)
Volume$736.95K
Capitalization12.78B
Friedman Industries
Price$20.29
Change-$0.28 (-1.36%)
Volume$20.97K
Capitalization143.24M
CRS vs FRD Comparison Chart in %
CRS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRS vs. FRD commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRS is a StrongBuy and FRD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CRS: $256.27 vs. FRD: $20.29)
Brand notoriety: CRS and FRD are both not notable
CRS represents the Metal Fabrication, while FRD is part of the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRS: 83% vs. FRD: 73%
Market capitalization -- CRS: $12.78B vs. FRD: $143.24M
CRS [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $12.78B. FRD’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $143.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $31.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $2.2B. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRD’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CRS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CRS and FRD are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FRD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRS is a better buy in the short-term than FRD.

Price Growth

CRS (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а +4.37% price change this week, while FRD (@Steel) price change was -7.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.02%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (-1.79% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

@Steel (+2.43% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRS($12.8B) has a higher market cap than FRD($143M). CRS has higher P/E ratio than FRD: CRS (34.54) vs FRD (16.77). CRS YTD gains are higher at: 51.462 vs. FRD (33.740). CRS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 670M vs. FRD (17.3M). CRS has more cash in the bank: 316M vs. FRD (2.1M). FRD has less debt than CRS: FRD (35.8M) vs CRS (703M). CRS has higher revenues than FRD: CRS (2.88B) vs FRD (465M).
CRSFRDCRS / FRD
Capitalization12.8B143M8,951%
EBITDA670M17.3M3,873%
Gain YTD51.46233.740153%
P/E Ratio34.5416.77206%
Revenue2.88B465M619%
Total Cash316M2.1M15,055%
Total Debt703M35.8M1,964%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRS vs FRD: Fundamental Ratings
CRS
FRD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1068
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
526
SMR RATING
1..100
4381
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
498
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRD's Valuation (18) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRS (82). This means that FRD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRS’s over the last 12 months.

CRS's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as FRD (26). This means that CRS’s stock grew similarly to FRD’s over the last 12 months.

CRS's SMR Rating (43) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRD (81). This means that CRS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRD’s over the last 12 months.

FRD's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as CRS (46). This means that FRD’s stock grew similarly to CRS’s over the last 12 months.

FRD's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRS (49). This means that FRD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRSFRD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGOV20.490.03
+0.15%
First Trust Intermediate Gvt Opps ETF
CLOI52.920.03
+0.06%
VanEck CLO ETF
PCCE14.36-0.04
-0.26%
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
HAWX38.57-0.18
-0.47%
iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI ACWI exUS ETF
DEXC57.27-0.29
-0.50%
Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF

CRS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRS has been loosely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRS jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRS
1D Price
Change %
CRS100%
+1.69%
NUE - CRS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
ATI - CRS
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
CLF - CRS
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
RS - CRS
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
MTUS - CRS
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

FRD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRD and IIIN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRD and IIIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRD
1D Price
Change %
FRD100%
-1.36%
IIIN - FRD
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
RYI - FRD
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
ESAB - FRD
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
PRLB - FRD
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
CRS - FRD
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
More