Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRSCX vs SKNRX
CRSCX vs SKNRX Comparison
Open Charts CRSCX vs SKNRX
CRSCX vs SKNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRSCX vs. SKNRX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRSCX is a Hold and SKNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRSCX has more cash in the bank: 1.54B vs. SKNRX (851M). CRSCX pays higher dividends than SKNRX: CRSCX (7.20) vs SKNRX (5.79). CRSCX was incepted earlier than SKNRX: CRSCX (22 years) vs SKNRX (22 years). CRSCX (1.85) is less costly to investors than SKNRX (1.40). CRSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SKNRX (33.00). SKNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRSCX: SKNRX (1000) vs CRSCX (2500). CRSCX (500) and SKNRX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. CRSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.42 vs. SKNRX (26.79). CRSCX return over 5 years is better than : 70.56 vs. SKNRX (43.13).
| CRSCX | SKNRX | CRSCX / SKNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.10 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.40 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.012 | 22.085 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 851M | 181% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.20 | 5.79 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.42 | 26.79 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.55 | 33.51 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.56 | 43.13 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.38 | 73.20 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers