Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRSSX vs FTHFX
CRSSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CRSSX vs FTHFX
CRSSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. CRSSX (617M). CRSSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: CRSSX (1.03) vs FTHFX (0.59). CRSSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CRSSX (5 years) vs FTHFX (15 years). FTHFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than CRSSX (0.28). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CRSSX (26.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRSSX: FTHFX (1000000) vs CRSSX (3000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.43 vs. CRSSX (28.20).
| CRSSX | FTHFX | CRSSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.64 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.64 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.479 | 13.752 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000000 | 1000000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 617M | 11.2B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.59 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.20 | 30.43 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.50 | 59.04 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 57.59 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 249.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers