Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRSSX vs FTHFX
CRSSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CRSSX vs FTHFX
CRSSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. CRSSX (604M). CRSSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: CRSSX (0.99) vs FTHFX (0.57). CRSSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CRSSX (5 years) vs FTHFX (15 years). FTHFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than CRSSX (0.28). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CRSSX (26.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRSSX: FTHFX (1000000) vs CRSSX (3000000). FTHFX (24.29) and CRSSX (23.66) have marching annual gain over last year.
| CRSSX | FTHFX | CRSSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.64 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.64 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.627 | 15.175 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000000 | 1000000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 604M | 12.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.57 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.66 | 24.29 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.59 | 56.11 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 63.44 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 232.28 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement