It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePANW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PANW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CRWD (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.25% price change this week, while PANW (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.65%.
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2025.
PANW is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
CRWD | PANW | CRWD / PANW | |
Capitalization | 77.3B | 90.2B | 86% |
EBITDA | 294M | 1.15B | 25% |
Gain YTD | 39.832 | 2.984 | 1,335% |
P/E Ratio | 863.62 | 43.23 | 1,998% |
Revenue | 3.06B | 7.53B | 41% |
Total Cash | 3.48B | 3.37B | 103% |
Total Debt | 793M | 2.18B | 36% |
CRWD | PANW | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 18 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PANW's Valuation (83) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRWD (95) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRWD (20) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's SMR Rating (43) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (91) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRWD (42) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (71) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD | PANW | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 2 days ago67% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 2 days ago66% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 2 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 2 days ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 2 days ago57% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 10 days ago64% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 2 days ago68% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GDMN | 51.21 | 1.33 | +2.67% |
WisdomTree Efcnt Gld Pls Gld Ms Stgy ETF | |||
EVLU | 27.92 | N/A | N/A |
iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts Val Fac ETF | |||
VTEI | 98.30 | -0.24 | -0.24% |
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tx-Exm Bd ETF | |||
SPLV | 72.57 | -0.44 | -0.60% |
Invesco S&P 500® Low Volatility ETF | |||
FLKR | 24.77 | -0.17 | -0.68% |
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been loosely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD | 100% | -1.78% | ||
ZS - CRWD | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
PANW - CRWD | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.44% | ||
CYBR - CRWD | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
CLSK - CRWD | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
COIN - CRWD | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
More |