CRWD vs ZS
Both ZS and CRWD stand to benefit from increased demand in the cybersecurity and cloud computing space, due to major ransomware attacks that made headlines during the pandemic. CRWD and ZS have both emerged as major players, winning large contracts and making large acquisitions. CRWD is more focused on security and threat mitigation, recently launching Falcon+, which is a global network of trained experts monitoring all aspects of the web and dark web for suspicious signs of nefarious activity that might threaten their clientele. For a less zealous approach, CRWD offers AI-based threat protection for individuals and companies. ZS, as its name implies, is slightly more focused on providing analytics to aid clients of their cloud-based solutions whose companies are scaling up their network. As they grow into the cloud, the analytic tools are designed to not only protect companies from security threats but also to make informed decisions about the effects of changes, such as an increasingly remote workforce.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ZS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRWD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ZS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRWD (@Packaged Software) experienced а +8.55% price change this week, while ZS (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +5.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.
ZS is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+5.52% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRWD | ZS | CRWD / ZS | |
| Capitalization | 77.3B | 28.8B | 268% |
| EBITDA | 294M | -27.8M | -1,058% |
| Gain YTD | 47.431 | -9.528 | -498% |
| P/E Ratio | 863.62 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.06B | 1.9B | 161% |
| Total Cash | 3.48B | 2.46B | 141% |
| Total Debt | 793M | 1.23B | 64% |
ZS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CRWD | ZS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 17 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
CRWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 100% | -3.03% | ||
| CLSK - CRWD | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| COIN - CRWD | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| ZS - CRWD | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| RIOT - CRWD | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| NOW - CRWD | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.35% | ||
More | ||||
ZS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZS has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZS jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.