Advertisement
CRWD vs ZS
Both ZS and CRWD stand to benefit from increased demand in the cybersecurity and cloud computing space, due to major ransomware attacks that made headlines during the pandemic. CRWD and ZS have both emerged as major players, winning large contracts and making large acquisitions. CRWD is more focused on security and threat mitigation, recently launching Falcon+, which is a global network of trained experts monitoring all aspects of the web and dark web for suspicious signs of nefarious activity that might threaten their clientele. For a less zealous approach, CRWD offers AI-based threat protection for individuals and companies. ZS, as its name implies, is slightly more focused on providing analytics to aid clients of their cloud-based solutions whose companies are scaling up their network. As they grow into the cloud, the analytic tools are designed to not only protect companies from security threats but also to make informed decisions about the effects of changes, such as an increasingly remote workforce.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ZS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRWD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- ZS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а +11.97% price change this week, while ZS (@Computer Communications) price change was +9.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +5.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.04%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
ZS is expected to report earnings on Sep 08, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+5.76% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| CRWD | ZS | CRWD / ZS | |
| Capitalization | 218B | 27.3B | 799% |
| EBITDA | 329M | 144M | 228% |
| Gain YTD | 76.969 | -27.708 | -278% |
| P/E Ratio | 765.02 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 5.09B | 3.17B | 160% |
| Total Cash | 4.55B | 3.54B | 129% |
| Total Debt | 821M | 1.86B | 44% |
CRWD | ZS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZS's Valuation (48) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that ZS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZS (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew significantly faster than ZS’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as ZS (93) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to ZS’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as ZS (57) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to ZS’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZS (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZS’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | ZS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 17 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 78% |
Advertisement
CRWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 100% | -1.18% | ||
| PANW - CRWD | 79% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| OKTA - CRWD | 70% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| NOW - CRWD | 68% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| TENB - CRWD | 67% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| ZS - CRWD | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
More | ||||
ZS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZS has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZS jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.