Advertisement
CSAN vs FGPRB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSAN is a Hold and FGPRB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFGPRB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CSAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FGPRB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSAN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGPRB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSAN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FGPRB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CSAN (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а -10.40% price change this week, while FGPRB (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was -11.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was -1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil Refining/Marketing (-1.47% weekly)The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.
| CSAN | FGPRB | CSAN / FGPRB | |
| Capitalization | 4.42B | 273M | 1,618% |
| EBITDA | 6.27B | 195M | 3,216% |
| Gain YTD | -14.522 | 14.391 | -101% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.97 | 90.24 | 7% |
| Revenue | 43.6B | 1.94B | 2,253% |
| Total Cash | 16.5B | 109M | 15,138% |
| Total Debt | 66.8B | 1.51B | 4,430% |
| CSAN | FGPRB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 66% | 29 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 13 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
CSAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSAN has been loosely correlated with UGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSAN jumps, then UGP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSAN | 100% | -2.31% | ||
| UGP - CSAN | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| DINO - CSAN | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.86% | ||
| CTXAY - CSAN | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
| DK - CSAN | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.03% | ||
| DKL - CSAN | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.71% | ||
More | ||||
FGPRB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FGPRB and FGPR have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGPRB and FGPR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FGPRB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGPRB | 100% | N/A | ||
| FGPR - FGPRB | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.17% | ||
| DINO - FGPRB | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.86% | ||
| PKCPY - FGPRB | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LKCRU - FGPRB | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CSAN - FGPRB | -1% Poorly correlated | -2.31% | ||
More | ||||