Advertisement
CSCO vs MOBBW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSCO is a Hold and MOBBW is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSCO’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileMOBBW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CSCO’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- MOBBW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSCO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOBBW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MOBBW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CSCO (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while MOBBW (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -1.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.28%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSCO is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Telecommunications Equipment (+3.69% weekly)The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
| CSCO | MOBBW | CSCO / MOBBW | |
| Capitalization | 202B | 345M | 58,551% |
| EBITDA | 18.2B | -6.28M | -289,656% |
| Gain YTD | 17.206 | -28.250 | -61% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.20 | 101.28 | 15% |
| Revenue | 57.2B | 3.3M | 1,732,283% |
| Total Cash | 25.7B | 12.3M | 208,943% |
| Total Debt | 11.6B | 662K | 1,752,266% |
CSCO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CSCO | MOBBW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 38% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 10 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 42% | 19 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AAA | 24.99 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| Alternative AccessFirstPriorityCLO BdETF | |||
| TIP | 109.70 | 0.12 | +0.11% |
| iShares TIPS Bond ETF | |||
| FLIA | 20.45 | N/A | -0.02% |
| Franklin International Aggregate Bd ETF | |||
| POWA | 87.57 | -0.04 | -0.04% |
| Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | |||
| OZEM | 25.83 | -0.23 | -0.89% |
| Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF | |||
CSCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSCO has been loosely correlated with EXTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSCO jumps, then EXTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSCO | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| EXTR - CSCO | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| LITE - CSCO | 61% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ZBRA - CSCO | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| CIEN - CSCO | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| BDC - CSCO | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.25% | ||
More | ||||