CSCO
Price
$66.90
Change
-$1.09 (-1.60%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
264.47B
66 days until earnings call
MOBBW
Price
$1.78
Change
+$0.38 (+27.14%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSCO vs MOBBW

Header iconCSCO vs MOBBW Comparison
Open Charts CSCO vs MOBBWBanner chart's image
Cisco Systems
Price$66.90
Change-$1.09 (-1.60%)
Volume$21.05M
Capitalization264.47B
Mobilicom
Price$1.78
Change+$0.38 (+27.14%)
Volume$14.72K
CapitalizationN/A
CSCO vs MOBBW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOBBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSCO vs. MOBBW commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSCO is a Hold and MOBBW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CSCO: $66.90 vs. MOBBW: $1.78)
Brand notoriety: CSCO: Notable vs. MOBBW: Not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSCO: 112% vs. MOBBW: 73%
Market capitalization -- CSCO: $264.47B vs. MOBBW: $0
CSCO [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $264.47B. MOBBW’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $264.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSCO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMOBBW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSCO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MOBBW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSCO is a better buy in the long-term than MOBBW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSCO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOBBW’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSCO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
  • MOBBW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CSCO and MOBBW are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CSCO (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -3.17% price change this week, while MOBBW (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +7.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSCO is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-0.23% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOBBW has higher P/E ratio than CSCO: MOBBW (66.64) vs CSCO (26.24). MOBBW YTD gains are higher at: 122.500 vs. CSCO (15.225). CSCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.1B vs. MOBBW (-7.28M). CSCO has more cash in the bank: 15.6B vs. MOBBW (6.83M). MOBBW has less debt than CSCO: MOBBW (525K) vs CSCO (29.3B). CSCO has higher revenues than MOBBW: CSCO (55.6B) vs MOBBW (2.83M).
CSCOMOBBWCSCO / MOBBW
Capitalization264BN/A-
EBITDA15.1B-7.28M-207,416%
Gain YTD15.225122.50012%
P/E Ratio26.2466.6439%
Revenue55.6B2.83M1,967,445%
Total Cash15.6B6.83M228,304%
Total Debt29.3B525K5,580,952%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSCO: Fundamental Ratings
CSCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSCOMOBBW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOBBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNOY15.000.16
+1.08%
YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF
ACP5.900.01
+0.17%
abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund
IGSB53.000.08
+0.15%
iShares 1-5 Year invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF
BDGS33.930.03
+0.08%
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
SVIX20.13-0.06
-0.30%
-1x Short VIX Futures ETF

CSCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSCO has been loosely correlated with EXTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSCO jumps, then EXTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSCO
1D Price
Change %
CSCO100%
-1.60%
EXTR - CSCO
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.34%
BDC - CSCO
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
ZBRA - CSCO
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
LITE - CSCO
56%
Loosely correlated
+5.32%
CIEN - CSCO
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
More

MOBBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOBBW has been loosely correlated with MOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOBBW jumps, then MOB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOBBW
1D Price
Change %
MOBBW100%
+27.14%
MOB - MOBBW
40%
Loosely correlated
+7.58%
AMPG - MOBBW
25%
Poorly correlated
-10.33%
CSCO - MOBBW
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
UI - MOBBW
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
CMTL - MOBBW
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.22%
More