CSCO
Price
$111.04
Change
+$1.45 (+1.32%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
437.66B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MOBBW
Price
$2.32
Change
+$0.03 (+1.31%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSCO vs MOBBW

CSCO vs MOBBW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSCO vs. MOBBW commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSCO is a Hold and MOBBW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CSCO: $111.04 vs. MOBBW: $2.32)
Brand notoriety: CSCO: Notable vs. MOBBW: Not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSCO: 75% vs. MOBBW: 57%
Market capitalization -- CSCO: $437.66B vs. MOBBW: $0
CSCO [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $437.66B. MOBBW’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $437.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $20.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSCO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMOBBW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSCO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MOBBW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSCO is a better buy in the long-term than MOBBW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSCO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOBBW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSCO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MOBBW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MOBBW is a better buy in the short-term than CSCO.

Price Growth

CSCO (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -0.57% price change this week, while MOBBW (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +5.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -6.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSCO is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-6.52% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOBBW has higher P/E ratio than CSCO: MOBBW (66.64) vs CSCO (33.35). CSCO YTD gains are higher at: 46.253 vs. MOBBW (-27.950). CSCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 18.1B vs. MOBBW (-7.28M). CSCO has more cash in the bank: 16.6B vs. MOBBW (6.83M). MOBBW has less debt than CSCO: MOBBW (525K) vs CSCO (31.3B). CSCO has higher revenues than MOBBW: CSCO (60.7B) vs MOBBW (2.83M).
CSCOMOBBWCSCO / MOBBW
Capitalization438BN/A-
EBITDA18.1B-7.28M-248,625%
Gain YTD46.253-27.950-165%
P/E Ratio33.3566.6450%
Revenue60.7B2.83M2,147,912%
Total Cash16.6B6.83M242,939%
Total Debt31.3B525K5,961,905%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSCO: Fundamental Ratings
CSCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9
SMR RATING
1..100
38
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSCOMOBBW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MOBBW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCCLX28.150.25
+0.90%
GMO Climate Change I
GTSYX35.420.29
+0.83%
Invesco Small Cap Growth Y
ANOHX29.570.14
+0.48%
American Century Small Cap Growth G
BGATX13.79N/A
N/A
Baillie Gifford Global Alpha Equities 2
FSSEX14.83N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI Sustainable Intl Eq

CSCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSCO has been loosely correlated with HPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSCO jumps, then HPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSCO
1D Price
Change %
CSCO100%
+1.32%
HPE - CSCO
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
EXTR - CSCO
47%
Loosely correlated
+3.14%
ITRN - CSCO
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
CRNT - CSCO
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
VIAV - CSCO
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
More

MOBBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOBBW has been loosely correlated with MOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOBBW jumps, then MOB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOBBW
1D Price
Change %
MOBBW100%
+1.31%
MOB - MOBBW
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
AMPG - MOBBW
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
HPE - MOBBW
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
CSCO - MOBBW
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
UI - MOBBW
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
More