Advertisement
CSCO vs MOBBW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSCO is a Buy and MOBBW is a StrongBuy.
CSCO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CSCO | MOBBW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 10 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 41% | 8 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSCO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MOBBW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CSCO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MOBBW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSCO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOBBW’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MOBBW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CSCO (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +5.56% price change this week, while MOBBW (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +8.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSCO is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Telecommunications Equipment (+2.75% weekly)The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
Advertisement
CSCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSCO has been loosely correlated with HPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSCO jumps, then HPE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSCO | 100% | +3.56% | ||
| HPE - CSCO | 51% Loosely correlated | +7.36% | ||
| EXTR - CSCO | 49% Loosely correlated | +5.23% | ||
| ITRN - CSCO | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| CRNT - CSCO | 37% Loosely correlated | +3.81% | ||
| NOK - CSCO | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.22% | ||
More | ||||
MOBBW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOBBW has been loosely correlated with MOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOBBW jumps, then MOB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOBBW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOBBW | 100% | +9.84% | ||
| MOB - MOBBW | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| AMPG - MOBBW | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
| HPE - MOBBW | 22% Poorly correlated | +7.36% | ||
| CSCO - MOBBW | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.56% | ||
| UI - MOBBW | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.78% | ||
More | ||||