Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSECX vs GFACX
CSECX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CSECX vs GFACX
CSECX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSECX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSECX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CSECX (3.53B). CSECX pays higher dividends than GFACX: CSECX (0.15) vs GFACX (0.00). CSECX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CSECX (32 years) vs GFACX (25 years). CSECX (1.66) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CSECX (14.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSECX: GFACX (250) vs CSECX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. CSECX (-48.33). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 6.08 vs. CSECX (-55.65).
| CSECX | GFACX | CSECX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.35 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.35 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.320 | 5.973 | -190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.53B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -48.33 | 5.89 | -820% |
| Returns for 3 years | -49.68 | 36.71 | -135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -55.65 | 6.08 | -915% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.25 | 88.28 | -39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers