Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSECX vs RGAGX
CSECX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts CSECX vs RGAGX
CSECX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSECX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSECX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CSECX (3.35B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than CSECX: RGAGX (0.51) vs CSECX (0.15). CSECX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: CSECX (32 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). CSECX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CSECX (14.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSECX: RGAGX (250) vs CSECX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. CSECX (-47.80). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.74 vs. CSECX (-55.78).
| CSECX | RGAGX | CSECX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.29 | 572% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.29 | 572% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.877 | 7.335 | -107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.35B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.51 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -47.80 | 4.75 | -1,007% |
| Returns for 3 years | -49.57 | 41.00 | -121% |
| Returns for 5 years | -55.78 | 17.74 | -314% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.19 | 106.44 | -33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement