Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFAX vs JNGSX
CSFAX vs JNGSX Comparison
Open Charts CSFAX vs JNGSX
CSFAX vs JNGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFAX vs. JNGSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFAX is a Hold and JNGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFAX has more cash in the bank: 2.3B vs. JNGSX (347M). JNGSX (3.06) and CSFAX (2.95) have matching dividends . CSFAX was incepted earlier than JNGSX: CSFAX (22 years) vs JNGSX (17 years). CSFAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than JNGSX (0.81). JNGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CSFAX (57.00). CSFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGSX: CSFAX (0) vs JNGSX (2500). JNGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.24 vs. CSFAX (4.81). CSFAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.37 vs. JNGSX (-4.68).
| CSFAX | JNGSX | CSFAX / JNGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.81 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.81 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.792 | 7.658 | 76% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 347M | 663% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 3.06 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.81 | 6.24 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.25 | 26.48 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.37 | -4.68 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.72 | 60.35 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement