Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFAX vs MGLCX
CSFAX vs MGLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFAX vs MGLCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty A
Price$54.88
Change+$0.54 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
MFS Global Real Estate C
Price$16.54
Change+$0.12 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.21B
CSFAX vs MGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFAX vs. MGLCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFAX is a StrongBuy and MGLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.21B vs. CSFAX (1.98B). CSFAX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: CSFAX (2.49) vs MGLCX (1.28). CSFAX was incepted earlier than MGLCX: CSFAX (21 years) vs MGLCX (11 years). MGLCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than CSFAX (1.19). CSFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. MGLCX (48.00). CSFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLCX: CSFAX (0) vs MGLCX (1000). CSFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.06 vs. MGLCX (-5.85). CSFAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.16 vs. MGLCX (3.04).
| CSFAX | MGLCX | CSFAX / MGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.94 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.95 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.689 | 2.733 | 355% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 2.21B | 90% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 1.28 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.06 | -5.85 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.16 | -2.71 | -522% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.16 | 3.04 | 862% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.47 | 17.83 | 311% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement