Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFAX vs MGLCX
CSFAX vs MGLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFAX vs MGLCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty A
Price$54.13
Change+$0.24 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
MFS Global Real Estate C
Price$16.48
Change+$0.08 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.28B
CSFAX vs MGLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFAX vs. MGLCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFAX is a Buy and MGLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. CSFAX (1.94B). CSFAX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: CSFAX (2.34) vs MGLCX (1.30). CSFAX was incepted earlier than MGLCX: CSFAX (21 years) vs MGLCX (10 years). MGLCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than CSFAX (1.19). CSFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. MGLCX (48.00). CSFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLCX: CSFAX (0) vs MGLCX (1000). CSFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.03 vs. MGLCX (2.14). CSFAX return over 5 years is better than : 22.20 vs. MGLCX (5.55).
| CSFAX | MGLCX | CSFAX / MGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.94 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.95 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.145 | 1.863 | 330% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 2.28B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.34 | 1.30 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.03 | 2.14 | 375% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.12 | -12.79 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.20 | 5.55 | 400% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.96 | 9.19 | 457% |