Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFAX vs MGLCX
CSFAX vs MGLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFAX vs MGLCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty A
Price$55.41
Change-$0.19 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
MFS Global Real Estate C
Price$16.72
Change-$0.05 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
CSFAX vs MGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFAX vs. MGLCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFAX is a Buy and MGLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. CSFAX (2.06B). CSFAX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: CSFAX (2.47) vs MGLCX (1.28). CSFAX was incepted earlier than MGLCX: CSFAX (21 years) vs MGLCX (11 years). MGLCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than CSFAX (1.19). CSFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. MGLCX (48.00). CSFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLCX: CSFAX (0) vs MGLCX (1000). CSFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.38 vs. MGLCX (-5.07). CSFAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.84 vs. MGLCX (4.22).
| CSFAX | MGLCX | CSFAX / MGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.94 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.95 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.128 | 4.161 | 267% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 2.24B | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 1.28 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.38 | -5.07 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.42 | 14.41 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.84 | 4.22 | 613% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.02 | 12.25 | 376% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement