Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFAX vs MGLCX
CSFAX vs MGLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFAX vs MGLCX
CSFAX vs MGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFAX vs. MGLCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFAX is a Hold and MGLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFAX has more cash in the bank: 2.38B vs. MGLCX (2.17B). CSFAX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: CSFAX (2.85) vs MGLCX (1.83). CSFAX was incepted earlier than MGLCX: CSFAX (22 years) vs MGLCX (12 years). MGLCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than CSFAX (1.19). CSFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. MGLCX (35.00). CSFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLCX: CSFAX (0) vs MGLCX (1000). CSFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. MGLCX (10.96). CSFAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.58 vs. MGLCX (-12.35).
| CSFAX | MGLCX | CSFAX / MGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.93 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.94 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.405 | 10.321 | 101% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.38B | 2.17B | 109% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.85 | 1.83 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | 10.96 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.18 | 21.54 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.58 | -12.35 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.03 | 15.62 | 282% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement