Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFAX vs MGLCX
CSFAX vs MGLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFAX vs MGLCX
CSFAX vs MGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFAX vs. MGLCX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFAX is a Hold and MGLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFAX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. MGLCX (2.14B). CSFAX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: CSFAX (2.94) vs MGLCX (1.93). CSFAX was incepted earlier than MGLCX: CSFAX (22 years) vs MGLCX (12 years). MGLCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than CSFAX (1.19). CSFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. MGLCX (35.00). CSFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLCX: CSFAX (0) vs MGLCX (1000). CSFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.17 vs. MGLCX (6.72). CSFAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.34 vs. MGLCX (-11.01).
| CSFAX | MGLCX | CSFAX / MGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.93 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.94 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.190 | 6.489 | 111% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.28B | 2.14B | 107% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.94 | 1.93 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.17 | 6.72 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.21 | 8.66 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.34 | -11.01 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.95 | 15.82 | 303% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers