Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFAX vs NMMGX
CSFAX vs NMMGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFAX vs NMMGX
CSFAX vs NMMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFAX vs. NMMGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFAX is a Buy and NMMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFAX has more cash in the bank: 2.31B vs. NMMGX (54.1M). NMMGX (2.94) and CSFAX (2.93) have matching dividends . CSFAX was incepted earlier than NMMGX: CSFAX (22 years) vs NMMGX (18 years). CSFAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than NMMGX (1.09). NMMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.15 vs. CSFAX (57.00). CSFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMMGX: CSFAX (0) vs NMMGX (2500). CSFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.27 vs. NMMGX (10.34). CSFAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.37 vs. NMMGX (-2.34).
| CSFAX | NMMGX | CSFAX / NMMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.94 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.09 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.882 | 8.116 | 122% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 54.1M | 4,266% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 2.94 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.27 | 10.34 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.94 | 17.50 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.37 | -2.34 | -273% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.65 | 22.37 | 213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement