Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFAX vs NMMGX
CSFAX vs NMMGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFAX vs NMMGX
CSFAX vs NMMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFAX vs. NMMGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFAX is a Hold and NMMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFAX has more cash in the bank: 2.38B vs. NMMGX (54.3M). NMMGX (2.86) and CSFAX (2.85) have matching dividends . CSFAX was incepted earlier than NMMGX: CSFAX (22 years) vs NMMGX (18 years). CSFAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than NMMGX (1.09). NMMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.15 vs. CSFAX (57.00). CSFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMMGX: CSFAX (0) vs NMMGX (2500). CSFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. NMMGX (10.08). CSFAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.58 vs. NMMGX (-2.92).
| CSFAX | NMMGX | CSFAX / NMMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.94 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.09 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.405 | 8.881 | 117% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.38B | 54.3M | 4,376% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.85 | 2.86 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | 10.08 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.18 | 26.01 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.58 | -2.92 | -225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.03 | 20.82 | 211% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers