Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFAX vs TRGRX
CSFAX vs TRGRX Comparison
Open Charts CSFAX vs TRGRX
CSFAX vs TRGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFAX vs. TRGRX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFAX is a Buy and TRGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFAX has more cash in the bank: 2.31B vs. TRGRX (67.1M). CSFAX pays higher dividends than TRGRX: CSFAX (2.93) vs TRGRX (2.35). CSFAX was incepted earlier than TRGRX: CSFAX (22 years) vs TRGRX (18 years). TRGRX (1.68) is less costly to investors than CSFAX (1.19). CSFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. TRGRX (48.00). CSFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRGRX: CSFAX (0) vs TRGRX (2500). TRGRX (14.76) and CSFAX (14.63) have marching annual gain over last year. CSFAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.40 vs. TRGRX (-4.80).
| CSFAX | TRGRX | CSFAX / TRGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.95 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.68 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.169 | 12.208 | 108% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 67.1M | 3,440% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 2.35 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.63 | 14.76 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.07 | 25.02 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.40 | -4.80 | -196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.95 | 10.11 | 484% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers