Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFAX vs TRGRX
CSFAX vs TRGRX Comparison
Open Charts CSFAX vs TRGRX
CSFAX vs TRGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFAX vs. TRGRX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFAX is a Hold and TRGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFAX has more cash in the bank: 2.38B vs. TRGRX (63.8M). CSFAX pays higher dividends than TRGRX: CSFAX (2.95) vs TRGRX (2.34). CSFAX was incepted earlier than TRGRX: CSFAX (22 years) vs TRGRX (18 years). TRGRX (1.68) is less costly to investors than CSFAX (1.19). CSFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. TRGRX (48.00). CSFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRGRX: CSFAX (0) vs TRGRX (2500). TRGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.08 vs. CSFAX (9.46). CSFAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.00 vs. TRGRX (-11.72).
| CSFAX | TRGRX | CSFAX / TRGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.95 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.68 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.791 | 7.567 | 103% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.38B | 63.8M | 3,724% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 2.34 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.46 | 10.08 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.20 | 25.18 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.00 | -11.72 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.66 | 6.73 | 574% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement