Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFYX vs MCOAX
CSFYX vs MCOAX Comparison
Open Charts CSFYX vs MCOAX
CSFYX vs MCOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFYX vs. MCOAX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFYX is a Hold and MCOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCOAX (1.89B) and CSFYX (1.86B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MCOAX pays higher dividends than CSFYX: MCOAX (2.01) vs CSFYX (1.45). CSFYX was incepted earlier than MCOAX: CSFYX (12 years) vs MCOAX (31 years). MCOAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CSFYX (0.81). CSFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 212.00 vs. MCOAX (40.00). MCOAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSFYX: MCOAX (15000) vs CSFYX (1000000). CSFYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.50 vs. MCOAX (25.69). CSFYX return over 5 years is better than : 22.11 vs. MCOAX (10.43).
| CSFYX | MCOAX | CSFYX / MCOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.93 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.93 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.405 | 20.331 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 15000 | 6,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 25000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 1.89B | 98% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 2.01 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.50 | 25.69 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.50 | 44.45 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.11 | 10.43 | 212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.72 | 81.06 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement