Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFYX vs MCOAX
CSFYX vs MCOAX Comparison
Open Charts CSFYX vs MCOAX
CSFYX vs MCOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFYX vs. MCOAX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFYX is a Hold and MCOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCOAX has more cash in the bank: 1.88B vs. CSFYX (1.74B). MCOAX pays higher dividends than CSFYX: MCOAX (1.94) vs CSFYX (1.56). CSFYX was incepted earlier than MCOAX: CSFYX (12 years) vs MCOAX (32 years). MCOAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CSFYX (0.81). CSFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 212.00 vs. MCOAX (40.00). MCOAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSFYX: MCOAX (15000) vs CSFYX (1000000). CSFYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.63 vs. MCOAX (16.81). CSFYX return over 5 years is better than : 10.62 vs. MCOAX (4.53).
| CSFYX | MCOAX | CSFYX / MCOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.93 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.93 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.520 | 18.158 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 15000 | 6,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 25000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 1.88B | 93% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.94 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.63 | 16.81 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.00 | 39.54 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.62 | 4.53 | 234% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.71 | 67.31 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers