Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs DGBCX
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs DGBCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$52.03
Change+$0.26 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
Price$8.16
Change+$0.05 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.32M
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. DGBCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a StrongBuy and DGBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. DGBCX (290M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSFZX (2.79) vs DGBCX (1.70). CSFZX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs DGBCX (17 years). DGBCX (2.42) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. DGBCX (47.81). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGBCX: CSFZX (0) vs DGBCX (1000). DGBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.72 vs. CSFZX (9.37). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 39.26 vs. DGBCX (24.21).
| CSFZX | DGBCX | CSFZX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.05 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.42 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.920 | 0.620 | 309% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 290M | 660% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 1.70 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.37 | 10.72 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.05 | -14.91 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.26 | 24.21 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.52 | -2.10 | -1,599% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers