Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs DGBCX
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs DGBCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$51.31
Change-$1.00 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
Price$8.03
Change-$0.18 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.25M
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. DGBCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a StrongBuy and DGBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.8B vs. DGBCX (296M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSFZX (2.79) vs DGBCX (1.70). CSFZX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs DGBCX (17 years). DGBCX (2.42) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. DGBCX (47.81). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGBCX: CSFZX (0) vs DGBCX (1000). DGBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.61 vs. CSFZX (6.24). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 52.66 vs. DGBCX (38.85).
| CSFZX | DGBCX | CSFZX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.05 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.42 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.468 | 1.489 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 296M | 609% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 1.70 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.24 | 8.61 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.61 | -16.39 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.66 | 38.85 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.69 | -1.56 | -2,220% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...