Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs DGBCX
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs DGBCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.03
Change+$0.14 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
Price$8.48
Change+$0.02 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.61M
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. DGBCX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and DGBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. DGBCX (300M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSFZX (2.89) vs DGBCX (1.63). CSFZX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs DGBCX (17 years). DGBCX (2.42) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. DGBCX (47.81). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGBCX: CSFZX (0) vs DGBCX (1000). DGBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.80 vs. CSFZX (4.24). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 34.30 vs. DGBCX (18.83).
| CSFZX | DGBCX | CSFZX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.05 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.42 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.293 | 4.963 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 300M | 669% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 1.63 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.24 | 4.80 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.17 | 5.57 | 237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.30 | 18.83 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.30 | 6.75 | 671% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers