Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs DGBCX
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs DGBCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.51
Change+$0.24 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
Price$8.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.26M
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. DGBCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and DGBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. DGBCX (301M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSFZX (2.67) vs DGBCX (1.63). CSFZX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs DGBCX (17 years). DGBCX (2.42) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. DGBCX (47.81). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGBCX: CSFZX (0) vs DGBCX (1000). DGBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.60 vs. CSFZX (8.32). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 24.38 vs. DGBCX (10.97).
| CSFZX | DGBCX | CSFZX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.05 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.42 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.308 | 4.963 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 301M | 646% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 1.63 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.32 | 10.60 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.11 | -2.91 | -141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.38 | 10.97 | 222% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.83 | 9.04 | 518% |