Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs DGBCX
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs DGBCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$51.87
Change+$0.33 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
Price$8.11
Change+$0.06 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.5M
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. DGBCX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and DGBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. DGBCX (290M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSFZX (2.91) vs DGBCX (1.60). CSFZX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSFZX (10 years) vs DGBCX (16 years). DGBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.85 vs. CSFZX (52.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGBCX: CSFZX (0) vs DGBCX (1000). DGBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.75 vs. CSFZX (5.70). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 2.41 vs. DGBCX (-8.76).
| CSFZX | DGBCX | CSFZX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.960 | -0.124 | -774% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 290M | 605% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 1.60 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.70 | 6.75 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.40 | -14.05 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.41 | -8.76 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.29 | -3.94 | -846% |