Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs DGBCX
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs DGBCX
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. DGBCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and DGBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.31B vs. DGBCX (335M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSFZX (3.24) vs DGBCX (1.06). CSFZX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSFZX (12 years) vs DGBCX (18 years). DGBCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. DGBCX (39.68). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGBCX: CSFZX (0) vs DGBCX (1000). DGBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.55 vs. CSFZX (13.67). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 8.26 vs. DGBCX (-2.37).
| CSFZX | DGBCX | CSFZX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.05 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.56 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.102 | 11.382 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 335M | 689% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 1.06 | 305% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.67 | 14.55 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.27 | 28.73 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.26 | -2.37 | -349% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.99 | 15.63 | 339% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement