Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs DRLAX
CSFZX vs DRLAX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs DRLAX
CSFZX vs DRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. DRLAX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and DRLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. DRLAX (337M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than DRLAX: CSFZX (3.24) vs DRLAX (2.47). CSFZX was incepted earlier than DRLAX: CSFZX (12 years) vs DRLAX (20 years). DRLAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. DRLAX (39.68). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRLAX: CSFZX (0) vs DRLAX (1000). DRLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.67 vs. CSFZX (12.42). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 9.81 vs. DRLAX (2.47).
| CSFZX | DRLAX | CSFZX / DRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.30 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.50 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.343 | 12.500 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.28B | 337M | 677% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 2.47 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.42 | 14.67 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.51 | 37.11 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.81 | 2.47 | 397% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.23 | 24.97 | 221% |