Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs FIKLX
CSFZX vs FIKLX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs FIKLX
CSFZX vs FIKLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. FIKLX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and FIKLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.32B vs. FIKLX (334M). CSFZX (3.24) and FIKLX (3.13) have matching dividends . CSFZX was incepted earlier than FIKLX: CSFZX (12 years) vs FIKLX (8 years). CSFZX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FIKLX (0.78). FIKLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. CSFZX (57.00). CSFZX (0) and FIKLX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.52 vs. FIKLX (4.16). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 6.85 vs. FIKLX (-18.82).
| CSFZX | FIKLX | CSFZX / FIKLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.78 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.78 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.471 | -2.762 | -234% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 334M | 693% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 3.13 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.52 | 4.16 | 253% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.70 | 12.64 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.85 | -18.82 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement