Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs IRFCX
CSFZX vs IRFCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs IRFCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$49.72
Change+$0.83 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
Cohen & Steers International Realty C
Price$8.15
Change+$0.19 (+2.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets236.52M
CSFZX vs IRFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. IRFCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and IRFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. IRFCX (237M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than IRFCX: CSFZX (2.79) vs IRFCX (2.01). CSFZX was incepted earlier than IRFCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs IRFCX (20 years). IRFCX (2.11) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). IRFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. CSFZX (52.00). CSFZX (0) and IRFCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.75 vs. IRFCX (-5.63). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 22.03 vs. IRFCX (-7.18).
| CSFZX | IRFCX | CSFZX / IRFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.00 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.11 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.231 | 1.144 | -370% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 237M | 807% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 2.01 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.75 | -5.63 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.68 | -25.58 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.03 | -7.18 | -307% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.15 | -6.34 | -412% |