Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs IRFCX
CSFZX vs IRFCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs IRFCX
CSFZX vs IRFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. IRFCX commentary
Aug 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and IRFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.38B vs. IRFCX (247M). IRFCX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: IRFCX (4.89) vs CSFZX (3.16). CSFZX was incepted earlier than IRFCX: CSFZX (12 years) vs IRFCX (21 years). IRFCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). IRFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. CSFZX (57.00). CSFZX (0) and IRFCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.41 vs. IRFCX (1.04). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 8.45 vs. IRFCX (-18.70).
| CSFZX | IRFCX | CSFZX / IRFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.00 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.19 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.660 | -0.016 | -65,936% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.38B | 247M | 962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 4.89 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.41 | 1.04 | 1,192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.59 | 21.06 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.45 | -18.70 | -45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.22 | 13.52 | 364% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement