Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs IRFRX
CSFZX vs IRFRX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs IRFRX
CSFZX vs IRFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. IRFRX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and IRFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.3B vs. IRFRX (237M). IRFRX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: IRFRX (5.65) vs CSFZX (3.27). CSFZX was incepted earlier than IRFRX: CSFZX (12 years) vs IRFRX (11 years). IRFRX (1.69) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). IRFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. CSFZX (57.00). CSFZX (0) and IRFRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.84 vs. IRFRX (-4.79). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 3.55 vs. IRFRX (-19.83).
| CSFZX | IRFRX | CSFZX / IRFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.50 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.69 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.508 | -4.769 | -115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 237M | 970% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 5.65 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.84 | -4.79 | -101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.46 | 14.06 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.55 | -19.83 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.15 | 17.21 | 274% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement