Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs NMMGX
CSFZX vs NMMGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs NMMGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.43
Change-$0.35 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
Northern Multi-Manager Glbl Real Estate
Price$10.70
Change-$0.07 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.06M
CSFZX vs NMMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. NMMGX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and NMMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. NMMGX (85.1M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than NMMGX: CSFZX (2.80) vs NMMGX (1.99). CSFZX was incepted earlier than NMMGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs NMMGX (17 years). NMMGX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. NMMGX (57.69). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMMGX: CSFZX (0) vs NMMGX (2500). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.51 vs. NMMGX (-1.33). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. NMMGX (15.04).
| CSFZX | NMMGX | CSFZX / NMMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.94 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.056 | 6.182 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 85.1M | 2,420% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 1.99 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.51 | -1.33 | -189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | 26.32 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.38 | 15.04 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.81 | -8.20 | -620% |