Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs NMMGX
CSFZX vs NMMGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs NMMGX
CSFZX vs NMMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. NMMGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and NMMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.31B vs. NMMGX (54.1M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than NMMGX: CSFZX (3.24) vs NMMGX (2.94). CSFZX was incepted earlier than NMMGX: CSFZX (12 years) vs NMMGX (18 years). NMMGX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). NMMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.15 vs. CSFZX (57.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMMGX: CSFZX (0) vs NMMGX (2500). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.67 vs. NMMGX (10.34). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 8.26 vs. NMMGX (-2.34).
| CSFZX | NMMGX | CSFZX / NMMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.94 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.102 | 8.116 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 54.1M | 4,266% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 2.94 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.67 | 10.34 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.27 | 17.50 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.26 | -2.34 | -354% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.99 | 22.37 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement