Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs NMMGX
CSFZX vs NMMGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs NMMGX
CSFZX vs NMMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. NMMGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and NMMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.38B vs. NMMGX (54.3M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than NMMGX: CSFZX (3.16) vs NMMGX (2.86). CSFZX was incepted earlier than NMMGX: CSFZX (12 years) vs NMMGX (18 years). NMMGX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). NMMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.15 vs. CSFZX (57.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMMGX: CSFZX (0) vs NMMGX (2500). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.41 vs. NMMGX (10.08). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 8.45 vs. NMMGX (-2.92).
| CSFZX | NMMGX | CSFZX / NMMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.94 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.660 | 8.881 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.38B | 54.3M | 4,376% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 2.86 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.41 | 10.08 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.59 | 26.01 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.45 | -2.92 | -289% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.22 | 20.82 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers