Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PGRKX
CSFZX vs PGRKX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PGRKX
CSFZX vs PGRKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PGRKX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and PGRKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.31B vs. PGRKX (1.77B). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PGRKX: CSFZX (3.24) vs PGRKX (1.85). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PGRKX: CSFZX (12 years) vs PGRKX (10 years). PGRKX (1.46) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. PGRKX (22.10). CSFZX (0) and PGRKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.34 vs. PGRKX (14.10). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 10.78 vs. PGRKX (0.96).
| CSFZX | PGRKX | CSFZX / PGRKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.46 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.46 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.393 | 13.488 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 1.77B | 130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 1.85 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.34 | 14.10 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.90 | 28.27 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.78 | 0.96 | 1,119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.59 | 33.44 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement