Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PGRQX
CSFZX vs PGRQX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PGRQX
CSFZX vs PGRQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PGRQX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and PGRQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.31B vs. PGRQX (1.12B). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PGRQX: CSFZX (3.24) vs PGRQX (2.81). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PGRQX: CSFZX (12 years) vs PGRQX (13 years). CSFZX (0.84) and PGRQX (0.81) have similar cost to investors . PGRQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. CSFZX (57.00). PGRQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.86 vs. CSFZX (13.67). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 8.26 vs. PGRQX (-3.58).
| CSFZX | PGRQX | CSFZX / PGRQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.81 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.81 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.102 | 12.791 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 1.12B | 206% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 2.81 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.67 | 16.86 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.27 | 33.11 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.26 | -3.58 | -231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.99 | 20.11 | 264% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers