Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PGRSX
CSFZX vs PGRSX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PGRSX
CSFZX vs PGRSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PGRSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and PGRSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. PGRSX (1.69B). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PGRSX: CSFZX (3.24) vs PGRSX (2.46). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PGRSX: CSFZX (12 years) vs PGRSX (12 years). PGRSX (0.90) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. PGRSX (22.10). CSFZX (0) and PGRSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.78 vs. PGRSX (9.47). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 7.14 vs. PGRSX (1.10).
| CSFZX | PGRSX | CSFZX / PGRSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.90 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.90 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.369 | 7.531 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.28B | 1.69B | 135% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 2.46 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.78 | 9.47 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.92 | 31.74 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.14 | 1.10 | 647% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.89 | 45.35 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement