Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs RREAX
CSFZX vs RREAX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs RREAX
CSFZX vs RREAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. RREAX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and RREAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. RREAX (407M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than RREAX: CSFZX (3.24) vs RREAX (2.70). CSFZX was incepted earlier than RREAX: CSFZX (12 years) vs RREAX (19 years). RREAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). RREAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. CSFZX (57.00). CSFZX (0) and RREAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.16 vs. RREAX (9.58). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 8.76 vs. RREAX (-2.47).
| CSFZX | RREAX | CSFZX / RREAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.34 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.42 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.276 | 8.409 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.28B | 407M | 561% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 2.70 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.16 | 9.58 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.30 | 32.12 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.76 | -2.47 | -354% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.69 | 17.04 | 356% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement