Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs SREAX
CSFZX vs SREAX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs SREAX
CSFZX vs SREAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. SREAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and SREAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.3B vs. SREAX (253M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than SREAX: CSFZX (3.27) vs SREAX (1.93). CSFZX was incepted earlier than SREAX: CSFZX (12 years) vs SREAX (12 years). SREAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). SREAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. CSFZX (57.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SREAX: CSFZX (0) vs SREAX (1000). SREAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.95 vs. CSFZX (5.19). SREAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.82 vs. CSFZX (4.18).
| CSFZX | SREAX | CSFZX / SREAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.30 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.64 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.066 | 8.788 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 253M | 909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 1.93 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.19 | 5.95 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.58 | 35.23 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.18 | 6.82 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.88 | 74.93 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers