Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TRGRX
CSFZX vs TRGRX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TRGRX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$53.84
Change+$0.25 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
T. Rowe Price Global Real Estate
Price$17.02
Change+$0.11 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.6M
CSFZX vs TRGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TRGRX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and TRGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. TRGRX (64.6M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TRGRX: CSFZX (2.89) vs TRGRX (2.30). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TRGRX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TRGRX (17 years). TRGRX (1.58) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TRGRX (31.90). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRGRX: CSFZX (0) vs TRGRX (2500). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. TRGRX (-0.05). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 33.55 vs. TRGRX (10.97).
| CSFZX | TRGRX | CSFZX / TRGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.95 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.58 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.696 | 1.124 | 596% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 64.6M | 3,107% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 2.30 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | -0.05 | -8,944% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.39 | 4.37 | 284% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.55 | 10.97 | 306% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.49 | 2.07 | 2,151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement