Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs TRGRX
CSFZX vs TRGRX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TRGRX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$51.31
Change-$1.00 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
T. Rowe Price Global Real Estate
Price$16.57
Change-$0.43 (-2.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.06M
CSFZX vs TRGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TRGRX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and TRGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.8B vs. TRGRX (67.1M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TRGRX: CSFZX (2.79) vs TRGRX (2.38). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TRGRX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TRGRX (16 years). TRGRX (1.53) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. TRGRX (31.90). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRGRX: CSFZX (0) vs TRGRX (2500). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.64 vs. TRGRX (4.74). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 52.66 vs. TRGRX (30.95).
| CSFZX | TRGRX | CSFZX / TRGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.95 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.53 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.468 | 0.885 | 279% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 67.1M | 2,689% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 2.38 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 4.74 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.41 | -16.67 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.66 | 30.95 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.84 | -3.01 | -1,126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...