Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TRGRX
CSFZX vs TRGRX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TRGRX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.27
Change-$0.03 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
T. Rowe Price Global Real Estate
Price$17.21
Change-$0.04 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.78M
CSFZX vs TRGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TRGRX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and TRGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. TRGRX (66.8M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TRGRX: CSFZX (2.67) vs TRGRX (2.00). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TRGRX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TRGRX (17 years). TRGRX (1.58) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TRGRX (31.90). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRGRX: CSFZX (0) vs TRGRX (2500). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.32 vs. TRGRX (5.96). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 24.38 vs. TRGRX (5.28).
| CSFZX | TRGRX | CSFZX / TRGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.95 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.58 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.308 | 2.368 | 266% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 66.8M | 2,909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 2.00 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.32 | 5.96 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.11 | -3.60 | -114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.38 | 5.28 | 461% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.83 | 4.75 | 986% |