Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TRGRX
CSFZX vs TRGRX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TRGRX
CSFZX vs TRGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TRGRX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and TRGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.38B vs. TRGRX (63.8M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TRGRX: CSFZX (3.27) vs TRGRX (2.34). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TRGRX: CSFZX (12 years) vs TRGRX (18 years). TRGRX (1.68) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. TRGRX (48.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRGRX: CSFZX (0) vs TRGRX (2500). TRGRX (10.08) and CSFZX (9.83) have marching annual gain over last year. CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 2.80 vs. TRGRX (-11.72).
| CSFZX | TRGRX | CSFZX / TRGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.95 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.68 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.056 | 7.567 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.38B | 63.8M | 3,724% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 2.34 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.83 | 10.08 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.54 | 25.18 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.80 | -11.72 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.68 | 6.73 | 649% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement