Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TRGRX
CSFZX vs TRGRX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TRGRX
CSFZX vs TRGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TRGRX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and TRGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.31B vs. TRGRX (67.1M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TRGRX: CSFZX (3.24) vs TRGRX (2.35). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TRGRX: CSFZX (12 years) vs TRGRX (18 years). TRGRX (1.68) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. TRGRX (48.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRGRX: CSFZX (0) vs TRGRX (2500). CSFZX (15.02) and TRGRX (14.76) have marching annual gain over last year. CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 11.32 vs. TRGRX (-4.80).
| CSFZX | TRGRX | CSFZX / TRGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.95 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.68 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.393 | 12.208 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 67.1M | 3,440% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 2.35 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.02 | 14.76 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.41 | 25.02 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.32 | -4.80 | -236% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.32 | 10.11 | 537% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers