Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGCX vs RLBAX
CSGCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CSGCX vs RLBAX
CSGCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGCX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. CSGCX (1.47B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than CSGCX: RLBAX (1.11) vs CSGCX (0.63). CSGCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CSGCX (32 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). CSGCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). CSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSGCX: RLBAX (250) vs CSGCX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.17 vs. CSGCX (6.11). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.90 vs. CSGCX (16.43).
| CSGCX | RLBAX | CSGCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.32 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.32 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.270 | 8.124 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.11 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.11 | 11.17 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.93 | 36.52 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.43 | 28.90 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.59 | 72.56 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement