Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGCX vs RLBFX
CSGCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CSGCX vs RLBFX
CSGCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGCX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. CSGCX (1.47B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CSGCX: RLBFX (2.03) vs CSGCX (0.63). CSGCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CSGCX (32 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). CSGCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). CSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSGCX: RLBFX (250) vs CSGCX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.40 vs. CSGCX (6.11). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.75 vs. CSGCX (16.43).
| CSGCX | RLBFX | CSGCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.30 | 550% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.30 | 550% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.270 | 8.732 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 2.03 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.11 | 12.40 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.93 | 40.94 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.43 | 34.75 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.59 | 85.40 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers