Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGCX vs RLBFX
CSGCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CSGCX vs RLBFX
CSGCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. CSGCX (1.46B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CSGCX: RLBFX (2.05) vs CSGCX (0.63). CSGCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CSGCX (33 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). CSGCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). CSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSGCX: RLBFX (250) vs CSGCX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.94 vs. CSGCX (5.34). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.73 vs. CSGCX (17.34).
| CSGCX | RLBFX | CSGCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.30 | 550% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.30 | 550% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.182 | 10.287 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 283B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 2.05 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | 12.94 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.83 | 46.32 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.34 | 35.73 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.72 | 86.86 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement