Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGCX vs RLBFX
CSGCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CSGCX vs RLBFX
CSGCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. CSGCX (1.46B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CSGCX: RLBFX (2.03) vs CSGCX (0.63). CSGCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CSGCX (33 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). CSGCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). CSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSGCX: RLBFX (250) vs CSGCX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. CSGCX (0.58). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. CSGCX (14.25).
| CSGCX | RLBFX | CSGCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.30 | 550% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.30 | 550% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.046 | 8.705 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 285B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 2.03 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.58 | 6.98 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.06 | 42.70 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.25 | 33.18 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.35 | 87.98 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement