Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGCX vs RLBFX
CSGCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CSGCX vs RLBFX
CSGCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. CSGCX (1.49B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CSGCX: RLBFX (2.02) vs CSGCX (0.63). CSGCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CSGCX (32 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). CSGCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). CSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSGCX: RLBFX (250) vs CSGCX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.28 vs. CSGCX (9.24). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.48 vs. CSGCX (20.54).
| CSGCX | RLBFX | CSGCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.30 | 550% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.30 | 550% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.540 | 9.885 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 2.02 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.24 | 17.28 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.58 | 37.83 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.54 | 39.48 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.28 | 92.04 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers