CSGS
Price
$63.73
Change
+$1.40 (+2.25%)
Updated
Jul 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.51B
14 days until earnings call
MRT
Price
$2.65
Change
-$0.10 (-3.64%)
Updated
Jul 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
39.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSGS vs MRT

Header iconCSGS vs MRT Comparison
Open Charts CSGS vs MRTBanner chart's image
CSG Systems International
Price$63.73
Change+$1.40 (+2.25%)
Volume$3.33K
Capitalization1.51B
Marti Technologies
Price$2.65
Change-$0.10 (-3.64%)
Volume$300
Capitalization39.83M
CSGS vs MRT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSGS vs. MRT commentary
Jul 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGS is a Hold and MRT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CSGS: $62.11 vs. MRT: $2.77)
Brand notoriety: CSGS and MRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSGS: 72% vs. MRT: 67%
Market capitalization -- CSGS: $1.51B vs. MRT: $39.83M
CSGS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.51B. MRT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $39.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSGS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMRT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSGS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSGS is a better buy in the long-term than MRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSGS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSGS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRT is a better buy in the short-term than CSGS.

Price Growth

CSGS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.77% price change this week, while MRT (@Packaged Software) price change was -8.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSGS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

MRT is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.59% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSGS($1.51B) has a higher market cap than MRT($39.8M). CSGS YTD gains are higher at: 22.780 vs. MRT (-18.289). CSGS has more cash in the bank: 186M vs. MRT (3.97M). MRT has less debt than CSGS: MRT (28.4M) vs CSGS (593M).
CSGSMRTCSGS / MRT
Capitalization1.51B39.8M3,786%
EBITDA195MN/A-
Gain YTD22.780-18.289-125%
P/E Ratio23.27N/A-
Revenue1.17BN/A-
Total Cash186M3.97M4,685%
Total Debt593M28.4M2,088%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSGS vs MRT: Fundamental Ratings
CSGS
MRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6188
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39100
SMR RATING
1..100
32100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
16n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRT's Valuation (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CSGS (10) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to CSGS’s over the last 12 months.

CSGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRT’s over the last 12 months.

CSGS's SMR Rating (32) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew significantly faster than MRT’s over the last 12 months.

CSGS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as MRT (49) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew similarly to MRT’s over the last 12 months.

CSGS's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSGSMRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SONY24.070.15
+0.63%
Sony Group Corporation
DBD59.040.04
+0.07%
Diebold Nixdorf
SNV55.53-0.21
-0.38%
Synovus Financial Corp
LXFR11.73-0.24
-2.01%
Luxfer Holdings PLC
MSW2.96-0.11
-3.44%
Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd

MRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRT and CSGS have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRT and CSGS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRT
1D Price
Change %
MRT100%
+0.36%
CSGS - MRT
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
APPS - MRT
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
HCAT - MRT
29%
Poorly correlated
+6.03%
PAR - MRT
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
PDFS - MRT
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
More