CSGS
Price
$62.10
Change
-$1.22 (-1.93%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.51B
11 days until earnings call
QTWO
Price
$89.23
Change
-$0.18 (-0.20%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.1B
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSGS vs QTWO

Header iconCSGS vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts CSGS vs QTWOBanner chart's image
CSG Systems International
Price$62.10
Change-$1.22 (-1.93%)
Volume$119.1K
Capitalization1.51B
Q2 Holdings
Price$89.23
Change-$0.18 (-0.20%)
Volume$369.31K
Capitalization3.1B
CSGS vs QTWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSGS vs. QTWO commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGS is a StrongBuy and QTWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CSGS: $62.10 vs. QTWO: $89.23)
Brand notoriety: CSGS and QTWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSGS: 52% vs. QTWO: 73%
Market capitalization -- CSGS: $1.51B vs. QTWO: $3.1B
CSGS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.51B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSGS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSGS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSGS is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSGS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QTWO is a better buy in the short-term than CSGS.

Price Growth

CSGS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.52% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSGS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.37% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTWO($3.11B) has a higher market cap than CSGS($1.51B). CSGS YTD gains are higher at: 22.760 vs. QTWO (-11.346). CSGS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 195M vs. QTWO (15.6M). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 324M vs. CSGS (186M). QTWO has less debt than CSGS: QTWO (549M) vs CSGS (593M). CSGS has higher revenues than QTWO: CSGS (1.17B) vs QTWO (625M).
CSGSQTWOCSGS / QTWO
Capitalization1.51B3.11B49%
EBITDA195M15.6M1,250%
Gain YTD22.760-11.346-201%
P/E Ratio23.27N/A-
Revenue1.17B625M187%
Total Cash186M324M57%
Total Debt593M549M108%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSGS vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
CSGS
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6957
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4095
SMR RATING
1..100
3290
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSGS's Valuation (10) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (54) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

CSGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (95) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

CSGS's SMR Rating (32) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

CSGS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (54) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

CSGS's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSGSQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGLFX27.010.01
+0.04%
American Funds Global Insight R-5
NVLIX65.40N/A
N/A
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG I
OPMYX35.14N/A
N/A
Invesco Main Street Mid Cap Y
WWSAX20.77N/A
N/A
Keeley Small Cap Fund A
HGXAX16.97N/A
N/A
Hartford Global Impact A

CSGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSGS has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSGS jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSGS
1D Price
Change %
CSGS100%
-1.93%
QTWO - CSGS
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
FRSH - CSGS
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
DOX - CSGS
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
CPAY - CSGS
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
RDVT - CSGS
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
More