Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGZX vs PRGTX
CSGZX vs PRGTX Comparison
Open Charts CSGZX vs PRGTX
CSGZX vs PRGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGZX vs. PRGTX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGZX is a Hold and PRGTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGTX has more cash in the bank: 8.4B vs. CSGZX (4.68B). CSGZX (0.00) and PRGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CSGZX was incepted earlier than PRGTX: CSGZX (16 years) vs PRGTX (26 years). CSGZX (1.03) is less costly to investors than PRGTX (0.93). PRGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.60 vs. CSGZX (25.00). CSGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGTX: CSGZX (2000) vs PRGTX (2500). CSGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 80.01 vs. PRGTX (54.68). CSGZX return over 5 years is better than : 97.65 vs. PRGTX (15.28).
| CSGZX | PRGTX | CSGZX / PRGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.93 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.93 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 52.005 | 34.991 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.68B | 8.4B | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 80.01 | 54.68 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 117.40 | 144.14 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.65 | 15.28 | 639% |
| Returns for 10 years | 368.35 | 159.15 | 231% |