Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGZX vs SCMIX
CSGZX vs SCMIX Comparison
Open Charts CSGZX vs SCMIX
CSGZX vs SCMIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGZX vs. SCMIX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGZX is a Hold and SCMIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCMIX has more cash in the bank: 28.7B vs. CSGZX (4.68B). CSGZX (0.00) and SCMIX (0.00) have matching dividends . CSGZX was incepted earlier than SCMIX: CSGZX (16 years) vs SCMIX (25 years). CSGZX (1.03) is less costly to investors than SCMIX (0.87). SCMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. CSGZX (25.00). SCMIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSGZX: SCMIX (0) vs CSGZX (2000). SCMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 84.81 vs. CSGZX (80.01). SCMIX return over 5 years is better than : 104.50 vs. CSGZX (97.65).
| CSGZX | SCMIX | CSGZX / SCMIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.87 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.87 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 52.005 | 53.048 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.68B | 28.7B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 80.01 | 84.81 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 117.40 | 131.19 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.65 | 104.50 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 368.35 | 377.48 | 98% |