Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHAX vs MLPFX
CSHAX vs MLPFX Comparison
Open Charts CSHAX vs MLPFX
CSHAX vs MLPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHAX vs. MLPFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHAX is a Hold and MLPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPFX has more cash in the bank: 2.46B vs. CSHAX (1.29B). CSHAX pays higher dividends than MLPFX: CSHAX (5.46) vs MLPFX (5.09). CSHAX was incepted earlier than MLPFX: CSHAX (16 years) vs MLPFX (16 years). CSHAX (1.49) and MLPFX (1.45) have similar cost to investors . CSHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. MLPFX (14.00). CSHAX (6%) and MLPFX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MLPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHAX: MLPFX (1000) vs CSHAX (15000). MLPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.03 vs. CSHAX (24.75). MLPFX return over 5 years is better than : 190.95 vs. CSHAX (174.78).
| CSHAX | MLPFX | CSHAX / MLPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.44 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.45 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.844 | 29.607 | 108% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 1000 | 1,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 2.46B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.46 | 5.09 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.75 | 33.03 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.35 | 97.22 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 174.78 | 190.95 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.53 | 169.23 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers