Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHAX vs RMLPX
CSHAX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHAX vs. RMLPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHAX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. CSHAX (1.04B). CSHAX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: CSHAX (7.07) vs RMLPX (5.21). CSHAX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: CSHAX (15 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). CSHAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). CSHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). RMLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHAX: RMLPX (2500) vs CSHAX (15000). RMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.31 vs. CSHAX (-0.75). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 232.54 vs. CSHAX (193.32).
| CSHAX | RMLPX | CSHAX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.10 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.10 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.073 | 9.757 | 21% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 1.18B | 89% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.07 | 5.21 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.75 | 2.31 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.86 | 56.60 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 193.32 | 232.54 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement