Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHAX vs SMFPX
CSHAX vs SMFPX Comparison
Open Charts CSHAX vs SMFPX
CSHAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHAX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.38B vs. CSHAX (1.2B). CSHAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHAX (5.86) vs SMFPX (2.85). CSHAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHAX (16 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CSHAX (1.49). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. CSHAX (31.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHAX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHAX (15000). SMFPX (20.29) and CSHAX (19.35) have marching annual gain over last year. CSHAX return over 5 years is better than : 151.21 vs. SMFPX (115.02).
| CSHAX | SMFPX | CSHAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.09 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.13 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.738 | 18.142 | 131% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 1000 | 1,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 1.38B | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.86 | 2.85 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.35 | 20.29 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.18 | 85.87 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 151.21 | 115.02 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.68 | 125.93 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement