Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHAX vs SMFPX
CSHAX vs SMFPX Comparison
Open Charts CSHAX vs SMFPX
CSHAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.42B vs. CSHAX (1.29B). CSHAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHAX (5.46) vs SMFPX (2.67). CSHAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHAX (16 years) vs SMFPX (14 years). SMFPX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CSHAX (1.49). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. CSHAX (31.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHAX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHAX (15000). CSHAX (24.75) and SMFPX (24.19) have marching annual gain over last year. CSHAX return over 5 years is better than : 174.78 vs. SMFPX (137.27).
| CSHAX | SMFPX | CSHAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.09 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.13 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.844 | 23.861 | 133% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 1000 | 1,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 1.42B | 91% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.46 | 2.67 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.75 | 24.19 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.35 | 83.64 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 174.78 | 137.27 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.53 | 120.04 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers