Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs EGLAX
CSHNX vs EGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. EGLAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and EGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. EGLAX (211M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than EGLAX: CSHNX (7.05) vs EGLAX (5.05). CSHNX was incepted earlier than EGLAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs EGLAX (13 years). EGLAX (1.92) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). EGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). EGLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). CSHNX (2500) and EGLAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.65 vs. EGLAX (-0.96). EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 245.40 vs. CSHNX (193.62).
| CSHNX | EGLAX | CSHNX / EGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.65 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.92 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.159 | 1.034 | 209% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 87% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 211M | 494% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 5.05 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.65 | -0.96 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.98 | 61.73 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 193.62 | 245.40 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.73 | 137.78 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement