Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs EGLAX
CSHNX vs EGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. EGLAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and EGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. EGLAX (218M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than EGLAX: CSHNX (6.61) vs EGLAX (4.46). CSHNX was incepted earlier than EGLAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs EGLAX (13 years). EGLAX (2.06) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). EGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). EGLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). CSHNX (2500) and EGLAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX (16.82) and EGLAX (16.53) have marching annual gain over last year. EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 250.66 vs. CSHNX (171.90).
| CSHNX | EGLAX | CSHNX / EGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.66 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.06 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.990 | 1.732 | 115% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 87% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 218M | 497% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.61 | 4.46 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.82 | 16.53 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 72.58 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.90 | 250.66 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.16 | 83.05 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement