Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs EGLAX
CSHNX vs EGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. EGLAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and EGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. EGLAX (214M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than EGLAX: CSHNX (6.67) vs EGLAX (4.51). CSHNX was incepted earlier than EGLAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs EGLAX (13 years). EGLAX (1.92) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). EGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). EGLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). CSHNX (2500) and EGLAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. EGLAX (4.18). EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 268.06 vs. CSHNX (210.02).
| CSHNX | EGLAX | CSHNX / EGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.65 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.92 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.107 | -2.928 | 38% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 87% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 214M | 476% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.67 | 4.51 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 4.18 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.10 | 67.08 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 210.02 | 268.06 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.83 | 90.46 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement