Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs EGLAX
CSHNX vs EGLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. EGLAX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and EGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. EGLAX (229M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than EGLAX: CSHNX (6.94) vs EGLAX (4.20). CSHNX was incepted earlier than EGLAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs EGLAX (13 years). EGLAX (2.06) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). EGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). EGLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). CSHNX (2500) and EGLAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.60 vs. CSHNX (22.31). EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 264.34 vs. CSHNX (166.81).
| CSHNX | EGLAX | CSHNX / EGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.66 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.06 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.232 | 0.368 | -63% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 87% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 229M | 467% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.94 | 4.20 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.31 | 23.60 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.17 | 78.09 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 166.81 | 264.34 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.39 | 44.28 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement