Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs EIPFX
CSHNX vs EIPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. EIPFX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and EIPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. EIPFX (81M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than EIPFX: CSHNX (7.05) vs EIPFX (2.50). CSHNX was incepted earlier than EIPFX: CSHNX (11 years) vs EIPFX (9 years). EIPFX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). EIPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). CSHNX (2500) and EIPFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EIPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.32 vs. CSHNX (-0.65). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 193.62 vs. EIPFX (73.93).
| CSHNX | EIPFX | CSHNX / EIPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.66 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.13 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.159 | 11.997 | 18% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 81M | 1,288% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 2.50 | 282% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.65 | 3.32 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.98 | 20.35 | 295% |
| Returns for 5 years | 193.62 | 73.93 | 262% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement