Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs GLPRX
CSHNX vs GLPRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GLPRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and GLPRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPRX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. CSHNX (1.04B). GLPRX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: GLPRX (7.76) vs CSHNX (7.05). CSHNX was incepted earlier than GLPRX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GLPRX (13 years). GLPRX (7.24) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GLPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). GLPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GLPRX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). GLPRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.44 vs. CSHNX (-1.82). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 195.35 vs. GLPRX (180.51).
| CSHNX | GLPRX | CSHNX / GLPRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 7.24 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 7.24 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.066 | 2.561 | 81% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 1.59B | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 7.76 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.82 | 1.44 | -126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.84 | 50.29 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 195.35 | 180.51 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.58 | 75.64 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement